KANUBHAI RAMANBHAI VASAVA vs ARCHANABEN NITINKUMAR THAKAR-HEIRS OF PANDYA SHARADABEN CHIMANLAL Advocate - P G SHAHPATEL — 21/2024

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 Section 12(1). Status: Defendant Evidence. Next hearing: 01st May 2026.

Defendant Evidence Next hearing 01-May-2026 this date has passed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJKH070007502024

Filing Number

21/2024

Filing Date

24-Jun-2024

Registration No

21/2024

Registration Date

24-Jun-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, THASRA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 Section 12(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KANUBHAI RAMANBHAI VASAVA

    Adv. D B PARMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ARCHANABEN NITINKUMAR THAKAR-HEIRS OF PANDYA SHARADABEN CHIMANLAL Advocate - P G SHAHPATEL

  2. 2.VISHAL NITINKUMAR THAKAR

    Adv. P G SHAHPATEL

Case History

  1. 01-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 16-Feb-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 06-Feb-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 02-Feb-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 12-Jan-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 22-Dec-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 28-Nov-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 03-Nov-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 03-Oct-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 19-Sep-2025

    OrderView PDF

    Summary This is a Gujarati court order regarding a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution. The court dismissed the petition (નકારામાં) and rejected most of the petitioner's contentions regarding alleged wrongful harassment by government officials. The court found that the petitioner's claims lacked merit and that the defendant officials acted within their authority. The order also directed the petitioner to bear court costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  14. 19-Sep-2025

    Issues

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 29-Aug-2025

    Order On Injuction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 08-Aug-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 14-Jul-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 25-Jun-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 08-May-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 23-Apr-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 04-Mar-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 31-Jan-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 26-Dec-2024

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 12-Nov-2024

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 23-Sep-2024

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 06-Aug-2024

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 24-Jun-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 24-Jun-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 21/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary This is a Gujarati court order regarding a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution. The court dismissed the petition (નકારામાં) and rejected most of the petitioner's contentions regarding alleged wrongful harassment by government officials. The court found that the petitioner's claims lacked merit and that the defendant officials acted within their authority. The order also directed the petitioner to bear court costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case