RANGITSINH VAKHATSINH SOLANKI vs RESHAMBEN MANUBHAI RATHOD Advocate - K N MAKWANA — 6/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9,39,151. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJKH070007052022
Next Hearing
22nd June 2026
Filing Number
6/2022
Filing Date
09-09-2022
Registration No
6/2022
Registration Date
09-09-2022
Court
TALUKA COURT, THASRA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RANGITSINH VAKHATSINH SOLANKI
Adv. P G SHAHPATEL
BUDHABHAI VAKHATSINH SOLANKI
SAMANTSINH VAKHATSINH SOLANKI
KALPESHKUMAR RANGITSINH SOLANKI
KOKILABEN SAMANTSINH SOLANKI
Respondent(s)
RESHAMBEN MANUBHAI RATHOD Advocate - K N MAKWANA
ASHABEN MANUBHAI RATHOD
Adv. K N MAKWANA
KAPILABEN MANUBHAI RATHOD
Adv. K N MAKWANA
SUNILBHAI MANUBHAI RATHOD
Adv. N K VAGHELA
JAGDISHBHAI MANUBHAI RATHOD
Adv. K N MAKWANA
SONALBEN MANUBHAI RATHOD
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-06-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 04-05-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 20-04-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 03-04-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 16-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
CASE SUMMARY: 6/2022 Outcome: The court dismissed the plaintiffs' (Rangitsinh, Budhabhai, and Samantsinh Vakhatsinh Solanki) interim application for temporary injunction. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to establish primary ownership rights over the disputed agricultural land in Village Nanadora (Survey No. 532, Plot No. 4-53-25, with current revenue account no. 438). The defendants, as registered owners and possessors with documented sale deeds dating to 1989, retain valid legal title. No cost order was imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
CASE SUMMARY: 6/2022 Outcome: The court dismissed the plaintiffs' (Rangitsinh, Budhabhai, and Samantsinh Vakhatsinh Solanki) interim application for temporary injunction. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to establish primary ownership rights over the disputed agricultural land in Village Nanadora (Survey No. 532, Plot No. 4-53-25, with current revenue account no. 438). The defendants, as registered owners and possessors with documented sale deeds dating to 1989, retain valid legal title. No cost order was imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts