RAVAJIBHAI RANCHHODBHAI BODANA vs INDRAJIT RAMABHAI PARMAR Advocate - R S CHAVDA — 515/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH070007012025
Filing Number
515/2025
Filing Date
17-Oct-2025
Registration No
515/2025
Registration Date
17-Oct-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, THASRA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Last updated 27-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAVAJIBHAI RANCHHODBHAI BODANA
Adv. M S SHEKH
Respondent(s)
-
1.INDRAJIT RAMABHAI PARMAR Advocate - R S CHAVDA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order
The court discharged the respondent Indrajit Ramabhai Parmar under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, finding that the cheque transaction had been fully settled between the petitioner and respondent, and no further proceedings were warranted. The court ordered the case dismissed on March 14, 2026, based on the voluntary consent and reconciliation of both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Complainant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Complainant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Complainant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Complainant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Complainant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 515/2025
The court discharged the respondent Indrajit Ramabhai Parmar under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, finding that the cheque transaction had been fully settled between the petitioner and respondent, and no further proceedings were warranted. The court ordered the case dismissed on March 14, 2026, based on the voluntary consent and reconciliation of both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts