VOHRA NAJIRBHAI KASAMBHAI vs THASRA NAGARPALIKA Advocate - P.G.SHAHPATEL — 28/2018
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 38,. Status: DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 30th March 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJKH070006232018
Next Hearing
30th March 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
28/2018
Filing Date
08-10-2018
Registration No
28/2018
Registration Date
10-10-2018
Court
TALUKA COURT, THASRA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
VOHRA NAJIRBHAI KASAMBHAI
Adv. H A PARMAR
Respondent(s)
THASRA NAGARPALIKA Advocate - P.G.SHAHPATEL
AASIFALI GOHARALI SAIYAD
Adv. none
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE
DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE
DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE
DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE
DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE | |
| 30-01-2026 | DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE | |
| 09-01-2026 | DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE | |
| 22-12-2025 | DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE | |
| 28-11-2025 | DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: RCS-28/2018 (Tasara Court, Gujarat) Outcome: The plaintiff's interim relief application (Application No. 05) is DISMISSED, while the defendant No. 1's counter-interim relief application (Application No. 23) is GRANTED. The court ruled that the plaintiff failed to establish primary possession of the disputed shop property on a first-information basis and cannot obtain injunctive relief against the lawful owner. An interim order restraining defendant No. 1 from taking unauthorized possession of the shop pending final judgment was issued in defendant No. 1's favor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: RCS-28/2018 (Tasara Court, Gujarat) Outcome: The plaintiff's interim relief application (Application No. 05) is DISMISSED, while the defendant No. 1's counter-interim relief application (Application No. 23) is GRANTED. The court ruled that the plaintiff failed to establish primary possession of the disputed shop property on a first-information basis and cannot obtain injunctive relief against the lawful owner. An interim order restraining defendant No. 1 from taking unauthorized possession of the shop pending final judgment was issued in defendant No. 1's favor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts