KANUBHAI RAMANBHAI MANGALBHAI ZALA vs MELABHAI SHANABHAI ZALA Advocate - S B PARMAR — 2/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,38,. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 20th April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJKH070005292023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2/2023
Filing Date
07-06-2023
Registration No
2/2023
Registration Date
07-06-2023
Court
TALUKA COURT, THASRA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
20th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KANUBHAI RAMANBHAI MANGALBHAI ZALA
Adv. K N PATEL
RAMANBHAI MANGALBHAI ZALA
Adv. K N PATEL
Respondent(s)
MELABHAI SHANABHAI ZALA Advocate - S B PARMAR
SHANKARBHAI SHANABHAI ZALA
Adv. S B PARMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-04-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 09-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 23-02-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 06-02-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary This Gujarati civil court judgment (Case No. 02/2023, Rajkot District Court) dismisses the plaintiff's suit for lack of prosecution under CPC Section 9, Rule 8. The court found that the plaintiff and their counsel repeatedly failed to appear before the court despite multiple notices and opportunities to present their case, demonstrating no genuine interest in pursuing the matter. The court held that continued adjournment of the case was unjustifiable, and consequently dismissed the suit on April 20, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This Gujarati civil court judgment (Case No. 02/2023, Rajkot District Court) dismisses the plaintiff's suit for lack of prosecution under CPC Section 9, Rule 8. The court found that the plaintiff and their counsel repeatedly failed to appear before the court despite multiple notices and opportunities to present their case, demonstrating no genuine interest in pursuing the matter. The court held that continued adjournment of the case was unjustifiable, and consequently dismissed the suit on April 20, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts