LATE BHAVANI SHANKAR AMBALAL JOSHI HEIRS PRAVINCHANDRA BHAVANI SHANKAR JOSHI(Legal Heir) vs ASHOKBHAI AS HASHMUKHBHAI VINODCHANDRA — 1/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 4. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CMA SC - CIVIL MISC. APPLICATION - SR/CIVIL/SMALL CAUSE COU
CNR: GJKH070003042023
Filing Number
1/2023
Filing Date
15-Apr-2023
Registration No
1/2023
Registration Date
15-Apr-2023
Court
TALUKA COURT, THASRA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Last updated 16-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.LATE BHAVANI SHANKAR AMBALAL JOSHI HEIRS PRAVINCHANDRA BHAVANI SHANKAR JOSHI(Legal Heir)
Adv. N R SODHAPARMAR1.
-
2.RASHMIKABEN PRAVINCHANDRA JOSHI
Adv. N R SODHAPARMAR1.
-
3.NITABEN DAUGHTER OF PRAVINCHANDRA JOSHI WIFE OF PANKAJKUMAR MANILAL GANDHI
Adv. N R SODHAPARMAR1.
-
4.SACHINKUMAR PRAVINCHANDRA JOSHI
Adv. N R SODHAPARMAR
-
5.NANDUBEN BHAVANISHANKAR JOSHI
Adv. N R SODHAPARMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.ASHOKBHAI AS HASHMUKHBHAI VINODCHANDRA
-
2.NIRUBEN VINODCHANDRA BHAVANISHANKAR JOSHI
-
3.SAVITABEN LAXMISHANKAR JOSHI
-
4.JAYESHBHAI LAXMISHANKAR JOSHI
-
5.DAKSHABEN LAKSHMISHANKAR JOSHI
-
6.NATUBHAI BHAVANISHANKAR JOSHI
-
7.ABEDABIBI MAJIDMIYA MALEK
Adv. H H MALEK
-
8.SATISHBHAI AS SHANTIBHAI BHAVANISHANKAR JOSHI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order
The Hasura High Court (Gujarat) decided to impose court fees on the National Legal Services Authority based on video prosecution records under Article 38, rejecting the defendant's plea. The court found sufficient grounds for legal action in the criminal case filed by the natural applicant and ruled that fees would be charged accordingly, with no separate order on costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Mar-2026
Urgent Hearing
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Mar-2026
Urgent Hearing
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Mar-2026
Urgent Hearing
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Feb-2026
Urgent Hearing
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Feb-2026
Urgent Hearing
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Feb-2026
Urgent Hearing
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Feb-2026
Urgent Hearing
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Feb-2026
Urgent Hearing
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Feb-2026
Urgent Hearing
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Feb-2026
Urgent Hearing
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Feb-2026
Urgent Hearing
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Feb-2026
Urgent Hearing
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Feb-2026
Urgent Hearing
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Feb-2026
Urgent Hearing
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Feb-2026
Urgent Hearing
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Jan-2026
Urgent Hearing
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Dec-2025
Urgent Hearing
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Nov-2025
Urgent Hearing
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Nov-2025
Urgent Hearing
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Oct-2025
Urgent Hearing
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Oct-2025
Urgent Hearing
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Oct-2025
Urgent Hearing
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Sep-2025
Urgent Hearing
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
31-Jul-2025
Urgent Hearing
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Jun-2025
Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-May-2025
Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-May-2025
Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Mar-2025
Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Feb-2025
Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Jan-2025
Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Dec-2024
Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Nov-2024
Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Oct-2024
Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Sep-2024
Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Aug-2024
Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Jul-2024
Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Jun-2024
Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-May-2024
Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Apr-2024
Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Feb-2024
Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Dec-2023
Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Oct-2023
Notice To Opponents
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Sep-2023
Notice To Opponents
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Aug-2023
Notice To Opponents
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Jul-2023
Notice To Opponents
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-Jun-2023
Notice To Opponents
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-May-2023
Notice To Opponents
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Apr-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Apr-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 1/2023
The Hasura High Court (Gujarat) decided to impose court fees on the National Legal Services Authority based on video prosecution records under Article 38, rejecting the defendant's plea. The court found sufficient grounds for legal action in the criminal case filed by the natural applicant and ruled that fees would be charged accordingly, with no separate order on costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts