LATE BHAVANI SHANKAR AMBALAL JOSHI HEIRS PRAVINCHANDRA BHAVANI SHANKAR JOSHI(Legal Heir) vs ASHOKBHAI AS HASHMUKHBHAI VINODCHANDRA — 1/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 4,. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CMA SC - CIVIL MISC. APPLICATION - SR/CIVIL/SMALL CAUSE COU
CNR: GJKH070003042023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1/2023
Filing Date
15-04-2023
Registration No
1/2023
Registration Date
15-04-2023
Court
TALUKA COURT, THASRA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
LATE BHAVANI SHANKAR AMBALAL JOSHI HEIRS PRAVINCHANDRA BHAVANI SHANKAR JOSHI(Legal Heir)
Adv. N R SODHAPARMAR1.
RASHMIKABEN PRAVINCHANDRA JOSHI
Adv. N R SODHAPARMAR1.
NITABEN DAUGHTER OF PRAVINCHANDRA JOSHI WIFE OF PANKAJKUMAR MANILAL GANDHI
Adv. N R SODHAPARMAR1.
SACHINKUMAR PRAVINCHANDRA JOSHI
Adv. N R SODHAPARMAR
NANDUBEN BHAVANISHANKAR JOSHI
Adv. N R SODHAPARMAR
Respondent(s)
ASHOKBHAI AS HASHMUKHBHAI VINODCHANDRA
NIRUBEN VINODCHANDRA BHAVANISHANKAR JOSHI
SAVITABEN LAXMISHANKAR JOSHI
JAYESHBHAI LAXMISHANKAR JOSHI
DAKSHABEN LAKSHMISHANKAR JOSHI
NATUBHAI BHAVANISHANKAR JOSHI
ABEDABIBI MAJIDMIYA MALEK
Adv. H H MALEK
SATISHBHAI AS SHANTIBHAI BHAVANISHANKAR JOSHI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
URGENT HEARING
URGENT HEARING
URGENT HEARING
URGENT HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 13-03-2026 | URGENT HEARING | |
| 06-03-2026 | URGENT HEARING | |
| 02-03-2026 | URGENT HEARING | |
| 28-02-2026 | URGENT HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Hasura High Court (Gujarat) decided to impose court fees on the National Legal Services Authority based on video prosecution records under Article 38, rejecting the defendant's plea. The court found sufficient grounds for legal action in the criminal case filed by the natural applicant and ruled that fees would be charged accordingly, with no separate order on costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Hasura High Court (Gujarat) decided to impose court fees on the National Legal Services Authority based on video prosecution records under Article 38, rejecting the defendant's plea. The court found sufficient grounds for legal action in the criminal case filed by the natural applicant and ruled that fees would be charged accordingly, with no separate order on costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts