GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs RAJESHBHAI RAMANBHAI PARMAR Advocate - R R MAKWANA — 233/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH070002512026
e-Filing Number
12-03-2026
Filing Number
233/2026
Filing Date
12-Mar-2026
Registration No
233/2026
Registration Date
12-Mar-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, THASRA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 27-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
118
Police Station
THASRA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAJESHBHAI RAMANBHAI PARMAR Advocate - R R MAKWANA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary of Case 233/2026 The court accepted the accused's voluntary guilty plea to charges under IPC Section 135 and, applying precedent that permits sentencing below the statutory maximum for first-time offenders from poor backgrounds, imposed a fine of Rs. 300 instead of maximum imprisonment. The court rejected capital punishment and upheld the accused's confession as voluntary, resulting in conviction with lenient sentencing in light of mitigating circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 233/2026
Summary of Case 233/2026 The court accepted the accused's voluntary guilty plea to charges under IPC Section 135 and, applying precedent that permits sentencing below the statutory maximum for first-time offenders from poor backgrounds, imposed a fine of Rs. 300 instead of maximum imprisonment. The court rejected capital punishment and upheld the accused's confession as voluntary, resulting in conviction with lenient sentencing in light of mitigating circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts