GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs RAMESHBHAI RAMANBHAI CHUNARA Advocate - S T TRIVEDIVAKIL — 220/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH070002382026

Filing Number

220/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

220/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, THASRA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11204060260109

Police Station

THASRA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAMESHBHAI RAMANBHAI CHUNARA Advocate - S T TRIVEDIVAKIL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court accepted the accused's voluntary plea of guilt under the Prohibition Act and Indian Penal Code 2023, sentencing him to a fine of ₹300 (or 2 days simple imprisonment if unpaid) instead of the maximum penalty, considering it his first offense and poor economic circumstances. The court followed the established precedent allowing for reduced sentences when warranted by sufficient grounds and the accused's admission of guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 220/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court accepted the accused's voluntary plea of guilt under the Prohibition Act and Indian Penal Code 2023, sentencing him to a fine of ₹300 (or 2 days simple imprisonment if unpaid) instead of the maximum penalty, considering it his first offense and poor economic circumstances. The court followed the established precedent allowing for reduced sentences when warranted by sufficient grounds and the accused's admission of guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case