GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs ISHMAILSHA SON OF AHEMADSHA KALUSHA FAKIR Advocate - M G MALEK — 46/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 115(2),351(2)(3),352,54. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH070000562026

Case disposed

Filing Number

46/2026

Filing Date

04-02-2026

Registration No

46/2026

Registration Date

04-02-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, THASRA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

30th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11204060250311

Police Station

THASRA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 115(2),351(2)(3),352,54

Petitioner(s)

GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

ISHMAILSHA SON OF AHEMADSHA KALUSHA FAKIR Advocate - M G MALEK

AHEMADSHA KALUSHA FAKIR

Adv. M G MALEK

MUMATAJBIBI WIFE OF AHEMADSHA FAKIR

Adv. M G MALEK

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

30-04-2026

Disposed

16-04-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

12-03-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

04-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

30-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

CASE SUMMARY Case 46/2026 - Government of Gujarat v. Ishmailsha and Others The court acquitted all three accused of charges under IPC Sections 115(2), 351(2)(3), 352, and 54, finding that the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The government's case alleged the accused assaulted the petitioner during a land dispute on 20 September 2025, but witness testimonies were contradictory, lacked corroborating evidence, and contained major discrepancies regarding the incident's location and sequence of events. The court emphasized that suspicion alone cannot replace legal proof, and where two interpretations exist, the one favoring the accused must be adopted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY Case 46/2026 - Government of Gujarat v. Ishmailsha and Others The court acquitted all three accused of charges under IPC Sections 115(2), 351(2)(3), 352, and 54, finding that the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The government's case alleged the accused assaulted the petitioner during a land dispute on 20 September 2025, but witness testimonies were contradictory, lacked corroborating evidence, and contained major discrepancies regarding the incident's location and sequence of events. The court emphasized that suspicion alone cannot replace legal proof, and where two interpretations exist, the one favoring the accused must be adopted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, THASRA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case