GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs KIRANKUMAR ALIAS GUGO SON OF MAHENDRABHAI TALPADA Advocate - S K BHAVSAR — 35/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 62,331(2),54. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH070000452026

Filing Number

35/2026

Filing Date

02-Feb-2026

Registration No

35/2026

Registration Date

02-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, THASRA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

30-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11204060250435

Police Station

THASRA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 62,331(2),54

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KIRANKUMAR ALIAS GUGO SON OF MAHENDRABHAI TALPADA Advocate - S K BHAVSAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Apr-2026

    Judegement

    The court acquitted the accused Kirankumar (alias Gugo) of criminal charges under IPC sections 62, 331(2), and 54, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that the prosecution's witnesses provided inconsistent and unconvincing testimonies, and the circumstantial evidence was insufficient to establish guilt. The accused was accordingly acquitted and ordered released on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 02-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 02-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 35/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted the accused Kirankumar (alias Gugo) of criminal charges under IPC sections 62, 331(2), and 54, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that the prosecution's witnesses provided inconsistent and unconvincing testimonies, and the circumstantial evidence was insufficient to establish guilt. The accused was accordingly acquitted and ordered released on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case