Heirs of Decd.Dhulabhai Somabhai Bin Kalidas Decd.Monghiben Dhulabhai Som vs Hiers of Decd.Khristi Dhulabhai Somabhai Bin Bhikhabhai Advocate - K S PARMAR1. — 15/2003
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 038. Status: FINAL ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJKH070000192003
Next Hearing
27th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
15/2003
Filing Date
27-06-2003
Registration No
15/2003
Registration Date
27-06-2003
Court
TALUKA COURT, THASRA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Heirs of Decd.Dhulabhai Somabhai Bin Kalidas Decd.Monghiben Dhulabhai Som
Adv. A R PARMAR1.
Mithabhai Dhulabhai Rohit
Adv. A.R.PARMAR1.
Kanjibhai Dhulabhai Rohit
Adv. A.R.PARMAR1.
Manibhai Dhulabhai Rohit
Adv. A.R.PARMAR1.
Popatbhai Dhulabhai Rohit
Adv. A.R.PARMAR
Respondent(s)
Hiers of Decd.Khristi Dhulabhai Somabhai Bin Bhikhabhai Advocate - K S PARMAR1.
Manibhai Dhulabhai Vankar
Adv. K S PARMAR1.
Shivabhai Dhulabhai Vankar
Adv. K S PARMAR1.
Dhaniben C/o.Dhulabhai Somabhai Khristi
Adv. K S PARMAR1.
Dahiben Dahyabhai Morarbhai Vankar
Adv. K S PARMAR1.
Ramiben Manilal Vankar
Adv. K S PARMAR1.
Champaben Chandubhai Vankar
Adv. K S PARMAR1.
Zavarben Mangalbhai Vankar
Adv. K S PARMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 10-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 16-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 09-03-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE | |
| 23-02-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary The case was dismissed/struck off due to the plaintiffs' non-appearance and failure to prosecute. Despite multiple opportunities and sufficient time granted, the plaintiffs and their counsel failed to appear in court or present their evidence, leading the court to dismiss the case for want of prosecution on August 16, 2016. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The case was dismissed/struck off due to the plaintiffs' non-appearance and failure to prosecute. Despite multiple opportunities and sufficient time granted, the plaintiffs and their counsel failed to appear in court or present their evidence, leading the court to dismiss the case for want of prosecution on August 16, 2016. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts