Government of Gujarat vs SURESHBHAI DHIRABHAI PARMAR Advocate - H S SAVANSHAH — 1447/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85(1),66(1)(b). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH050019862025
Filing Number
1447/2025
Filing Date
20-11-2025
Registration No
1447/2025
Registration Date
20-11-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, KAPADVANJ
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
140
Police Station
KAPADWANJ TOWN POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
SURESHBHAI DHIRABHAI PARMAR Advocate - H S SAVANSHAH
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 02-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 28-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 10-12-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Criminal Case 1447/2025 Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kapadvanj, convicted Sureshbhai Dhirabhai Parmar under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 66.1.B (public consumption of alcohol) and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 100 with imprisonment until court rising, or 3 days simple imprisonment in default of fine payment. The conviction under Section 85(1) was discharged due to insufficient evidence. Key Reasoning: The accused confessed to the crime in court, and considering the facts, circumstances, and the mitigating factors (accused being poor with family responsibilities), the court imposed a lenient sentence rather than rigorous imprisonment, citing the precedent established in *State of Gujarat v. Natwarlal Harchandlal Thakkar*. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Criminal Case 1447/2025 Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kapadvanj, convicted Sureshbhai Dhirabhai Parmar under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 66.1.B (public consumption of alcohol) and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 100 with imprisonment until court rising, or 3 days simple imprisonment in default of fine payment. The conviction under Section 85(1) was discharged due to insufficient evidence. Key Reasoning: The accused confessed to the crime in court, and considering the facts, circumstances, and the mitigating factors (accused being poor with family responsibilities), the court imposed a lenient sentence rather than rigorous imprisonment, citing the precedent established in *State of Gujarat v. Natwarlal Harchandlal Thakkar*. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts