Government of Gujarat vs IMARANALI AKA DHERO HASANALI SAIYAD Advocate - J A KURESHI — 1443/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65aa. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH050019822025

Case disposed

Filing Number

1443/2025

Filing Date

20-11-2025

Registration No

1443/2025

Registration Date

20-11-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, KAPADVANJ

Judge

3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

369

Police Station

KAPADWANJ TOWN POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65aa

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

IMARANALI AKA DHERO HASANALI SAIYAD Advocate - J A KURESHI

Hearing History

Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

14-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

02-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

28-01-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

10-12-2025

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

The court found the accused, Imranali aka Dhero Hasanali Saiyad, guilty under the Prohibition Act Section 65-A for possessing approximately 0.1 liters of country liquor valued at Rs. 200 without proper authorization. The court sentenced him to a cash fine of Rs. 100 with simple imprisonment until the court rises, and in case of default in payment, an additional 2 days simple imprisonment, taking into account his plea of guilt, poor economic condition, and family responsibilities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court found the accused, Imranali aka Dhero Hasanali Saiyad, guilty under the Prohibition Act Section 65-A for possessing approximately 0.1 liters of country liquor valued at Rs. 200 without proper authorization. The court sentenced him to a cash fine of Rs. 100 with simple imprisonment until the court rises, and in case of default in payment, an additional 2 days simple imprisonment, taking into account his plea of guilt, poor economic condition, and family responsibilities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, KAPADVANJ All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case