Government of Gujarat vs IMARANALI AKA DHERO HASANALI SAIYAD Advocate - J A KURESHI — 1443/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65aa. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH050019822025
Filing Number
1443/2025
Filing Date
20-11-2025
Registration No
1443/2025
Registration Date
20-11-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, KAPADVANJ
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
369
Police Station
KAPADWANJ TOWN POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
IMARANALI AKA DHERO HASANALI SAIYAD Advocate - J A KURESHI
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 02-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 28-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 10-12-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court found the accused, Imranali aka Dhero Hasanali Saiyad, guilty under the Prohibition Act Section 65-A for possessing approximately 0.1 liters of country liquor valued at Rs. 200 without proper authorization. The court sentenced him to a cash fine of Rs. 100 with simple imprisonment until the court rises, and in case of default in payment, an additional 2 days simple imprisonment, taking into account his plea of guilt, poor economic condition, and family responsibilities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court found the accused, Imranali aka Dhero Hasanali Saiyad, guilty under the Prohibition Act Section 65-A for possessing approximately 0.1 liters of country liquor valued at Rs. 200 without proper authorization. The court sentenced him to a cash fine of Rs. 100 with simple imprisonment until the court rises, and in case of default in payment, an additional 2 days simple imprisonment, taking into account his plea of guilt, poor economic condition, and family responsibilities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts