Government of Gujarat vs BACHUBHAI AKA RAMESHBHAI KANTIBHAI BAJANIYA Advocate - F N MIRZA — 1406/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85(1),66(1)(b). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH050019342025
Filing Number
1406/2025
Filing Date
17-11-2025
Registration No
1406/2025
Registration Date
17-11-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, KAPADVANJ
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
337
Police Station
KAPADWANJ TOWN POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
BACHUBHAI AKA RAMESHBHAI KANTIBHAI BAJANIYA Advocate - F N MIRZA
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 02-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 29-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 12-12-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court found the accused Bachubhai aka Rameshbhai Kantibhai Bajaniya guilty under Gujarat Prohibition Act Sections 66.1.B and 85(1) for public consumption and intoxication from alcohol. The accused pleaded guilty in court and expressed remorse; considering this confession, his poor economic status, and family responsibilities, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine and imprisonment until court rising, with an alternative of 3 days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court found the accused Bachubhai aka Rameshbhai Kantibhai Bajaniya guilty under Gujarat Prohibition Act Sections 66.1.B and 85(1) for public consumption and intoxication from alcohol. The accused pleaded guilty in court and expressed remorse; considering this confession, his poor economic status, and family responsibilities, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine and imprisonment until court rising, with an alternative of 3 days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts