Government of Gujarat vs VIJAYBHAI JESANGBHAI PARMAR Advocate - H M JOSHI — 1400/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85(1),66(1)(b). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH050019272025
Filing Number
1400/2025
Filing Date
17-11-2025
Registration No
1400/2025
Registration Date
17-11-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, KAPADVANJ
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
201
Police Station
KAPADWANJ TOWN POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
VIJAYBHAI JESANGBHAI PARMAR Advocate - H M JOSHI
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 02-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 29-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 13-12-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Criminal Case 1400/2025 The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kapadvanj convicted Vijaybhai Jesangbhai Parmar under Gujarat Prohibition Act sections 66.1.B and 85(1) for public intoxication. The court found the accused guilty of consuming and displaying alcohol in public on 28-05-2025, but imposed lenient punishment given his confession, poor financial status, and family responsibilities. Sentence: ₹100 cash fine and imprisonment until court rising; with 3 days simple imprisonment if fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Criminal Case 1400/2025 The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kapadvanj convicted Vijaybhai Jesangbhai Parmar under Gujarat Prohibition Act sections 66.1.B and 85(1) for public intoxication. The court found the accused guilty of consuming and displaying alcohol in public on 28-05-2025, but imposed lenient punishment given his confession, poor financial status, and family responsibilities. Sentence: ₹100 cash fine and imprisonment until court rising; with 3 days simple imprisonment if fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts