Government of Gujarat vs JAGDISHBHAI BUDHABHAI HARIJAN Advocate - F N MIRZA — 571/2016
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 Section 004,005. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 02nd April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH050007002016
Filing Number
571/2016
Filing Date
30-Mar-2016
Registration No
571/2016
Registration Date
30-Mar-2016
Court
TALUKA COURT, KAPADVANJ
Judge
5-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
02-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 23-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
96
Police Station
KAPADWANJ TOWN POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2015
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.JAGDISHBHAI BUDHABHAI HARIJAN Advocate - F N MIRZA
-
2.VINUBHAI DEVJIBHAI VAGARI
-
3.FARUKBHAI MUSABHAI SHAIKH
-
4.ATULBHAI VIJLAL PARIKH
-
5.SUNILBHAI DHANJIBHAI VANKAR
-
6.VASIMBHAI HAIDARBHAI PATHAN
-
7.ARUNBHAI HARENDRABHAI PUROHIT
-
8.SHAKILBHAI HUSENBHAI MIRZA
-
9.IDRISH AHEMADKHAN PATHAN
-
10.MANOJBHAI NATVARBHAI ZALA
-
11.MAYURSINH INDRASINH ZALA
-
12.MAGANBHAI BHORSINHBHAI BHILALA
-
13.MAHOBATSINH / MANOJ ANDARSINH CHAUHAN
-
14.KIRITBHAI RANCHHODBHAI RANA
-
15.SAJIDBHAI MAHEBOOBBHAI SHEKH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary Case: Criminal Case No. 571/2016, Kapadvanj Court, Gujarat Decision: The court acquitted all 14 accused persons of charges under the Gujarat Gambling Prohibition Act and CrPC Section 188. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case with sufficient evidence, particularly lacking independent witness corroboration and proper documentary support for the seized materials (cash, mobile phones, and other items). The court held that mere police testimony without corroborating witnesses was insufficient to prove the guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Apr-2026
Disposed
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
09-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
02-Mar-2026
Further Statement
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
23-Feb-2026
Further Statement
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
09-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
29-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
13-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
11-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
18-Nov-2025
Plea
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
16-Oct-2025
Plea
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
29-Sep-2025
Plea
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
09-Sep-2025
Plea
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
28-Aug-2025
Plea
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
24-Jul-2025
Plea
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
04-Jul-2025
Plea
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
20-Jun-2025
Plea
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
25-Mar-2025
Process To Accused
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
20-Jan-2025
Process To Accused
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
23-Oct-2024
Process To Accused
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
25-Jul-2024
Process To Accused
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
04-Jun-2024
Process To Accused
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
06-Mar-2024
Process To Accused
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
08-Dec-2023
Process To Accused
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
12-Sep-2023
Process To Accused
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
19-Jun-2023
Process To Accused
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
25-Apr-2023
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
28-Feb-2023
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
13-Jan-2023
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
02-Dec-2022
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
17-Oct-2022
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
19-Sep-2022
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
01-Aug-2022
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
04-Jul-2022
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
03-Jun-2022
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
05-Apr-2022
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
08-Mar-2022
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
25-Jan-2022
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
04-Dec-2021
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
11-Sep-2021
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
17-Jul-2021
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
23-Apr-2021
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
02-Feb-2021
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
11-Dec-2020
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
22-Sep-2020
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
09-Jul-2020
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
15-May-2020
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
24-Mar-2020
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
11-Feb-2020
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
13-Jan-2020
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
29-Nov-2019
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
05-Jul-2019
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Apr-2019
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Apr-2019
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Mar-2019
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-Mar-2019
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Feb-2019
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Feb-2019
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Jan-2019
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Dec-2018
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Dec-2018
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Nov-2018
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Oct-2018
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Aug-2018
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Jul-2018
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Jul-2018
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Jun-2018
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-May-2018
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-May-2018
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Apr-2018
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
19-Mar-2018
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Mar-2018
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Jan-2018
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Dec-2017
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Nov-2017
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Sep-2017
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-Aug-2017
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Jul-2017
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Jul-2017
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Jun-2017
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-May-2017
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-May-2017
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Apr-2017
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Feb-2017
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Feb-2017
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Jan-2017
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Dec-2016
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Nov-2016
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Sep-2016
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Mar-2016
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Mar-2016
Case filed
Registration No. 571/2016
Summary Case: Criminal Case No. 571/2016, Kapadvanj Court, Gujarat Decision: The court acquitted all 14 accused persons of charges under the Gujarat Gambling Prohibition Act and CrPC Section 188. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case with sufficient evidence, particularly lacking independent witness corroboration and proper documentary support for the seized materials (cash, mobile phones, and other items). The court held that mere police testimony without corroborating witnesses was insufficient to prove the guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts