CHAUHAN NIKHILKUMAR KIRANBHAI vs Government of Gujarat — 74/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497,503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th May 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION JMFC
CNR: GJKH050006542026
Filing Number
74/2026
Filing Date
07-03-2026
Registration No
74/2026
Registration Date
07-03-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, KAPADVANJ
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
06th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
Police Station
KAPADWANJ TOWN POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
CHAUHAN NIKHILKUMAR KIRANBHAI
Adv. B D RATHOD
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
HEARING P.P.
HEARING P.P.
HEARING P.P.
HEARING P.P.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 05-05-2026 | HEARING P.P. |
| 27-04-2026 | HEARING P.P. |
| 15-04-2026 | HEARING P.P. |
| 07-04-2026 | HEARING P.P. |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CRMAJ 74/2026 Petitioner: Chauhan Nikhilkumar Kiranbhai Respondent: Government of Gujarat The court granted the petitioner's petition under Section 503 of the Indian Penal Code 2023. The petitioner claimed that ₹4,000 was wrongfully frozen in his State Bank of India account (Account No. 41246014474) under a cybercrime help-line scheme after he filed a cyber fraud complaint. The court found no evidence of police action, FIR, or investigation against the petitioner, and determined the frozen funds were unlawfully retained. Consequently, the court ordered the bank to unfreeze and return the full amount to the petitioner's account. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CRMAJ 74/2026 Petitioner: Chauhan Nikhilkumar Kiranbhai Respondent: Government of Gujarat The court granted the petitioner's petition under Section 503 of the Indian Penal Code 2023. The petitioner claimed that ₹4,000 was wrongfully frozen in his State Bank of India account (Account No. 41246014474) under a cybercrime help-line scheme after he filed a cyber fraud complaint. The court found no evidence of police action, FIR, or investigation against the petitioner, and determined the frozen funds were unlawfully retained. Consequently, the court ordered the bank to unfreeze and return the full amount to the petitioner's account. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts