Government of Gujarat vs ATULBHAI CHIMANBHAI PATEL — 317/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85(1),66(1)(b). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH050005802026

Filing Number

317/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

317/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KAPADVANJ

Judge

5-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

18

Police Station

ATTARSUMBA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85(1),66(1)(b)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ATULBHAI CHIMANBHAI PATEL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The Additional Chief Judge of Kapadvanj convicted Atulbhai Chimnbhai Patel under the Prohibition Act sections 85(1) and 66(1)(B) for consuming alcohol without permit in a public place and sentenced him to a cash fine of Rs. 200/- with imprisonment until the court rises, plus one day simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. The court granted lenient punishment considering the accused's guilty plea, remorse, poor socio-economic status as a daily wage laborer, and commitment to reform. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 317/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Chief Judge of Kapadvanj convicted Atulbhai Chimnbhai Patel under the Prohibition Act sections 85(1) and 66(1)(B) for consuming alcohol without permit in a public place and sentenced him to a cash fine of Rs. 200/- with imprisonment until the court rises, plus one day simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. The court granted lenient punishment considering the accused's guilty plea, remorse, poor socio-economic status as a daily wage laborer, and commitment to reform. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case