Government of Gujarat vs GOVINDBHAI PRATAPBHAI SOLANKI — 314/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65aa. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH050005772026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
314/2026
Filing Date
25-02-2026
Registration No
314/2026
Registration Date
25-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, KAPADVANJ
Judge
5-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
14
Police Station
ATTARSUMBA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
GOVINDBHAI PRATAPBHAI SOLANKI
Hearing History
Judge: 5-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court found the accused, Govindbhai Pratapbhai Solanki, guilty under the Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A) for possessing approximately 2 liters of illicit liquor worth ₹400 on January 25, 2026. The accused confessed to the crime in court and pleaded for leniency citing his poor economic status and family responsibilities. The court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹200 fine and simple imprisonment until the court rises, following judicial precedent that favors reduced punishment in such cases, rather than imposing the full statutory penalty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court found the accused, Govindbhai Pratapbhai Solanki, guilty under the Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A) for possessing approximately 2 liters of illicit liquor worth ₹400 on January 25, 2026. The accused confessed to the crime in court and pleaded for leniency citing his poor economic status and family responsibilities. The court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹200 fine and simple imprisonment until the court rises, following judicial precedent that favors reduced punishment in such cases, rather than imposing the full statutory penalty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts