Government of Gujarat vs LILABEN W/O AMARSINH BALUSINH ZALA — 313/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65aa. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH050005762026

Filing Number

313/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

313/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KAPADVANJ

Judge

5-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

12

Police Station

ATTARSUMBA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65aa

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.LILABEN W/O AMARSINH BALUSINH ZALA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    Summary The court convicted Lilaben Amarsinh Jhala under the Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A) for possessing approximately 2 liters of illegal liquor worth ₹400. The accused pleaded guilty before the court and requested leniency, citing her poor financial circumstances and family responsibilities. The court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹200 fine and imprisonment until the rising of the court, invoking established judicial principles for first-time offenders from economically disadvantaged backgrounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 313/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court convicted Lilaben Amarsinh Jhala under the Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A) for possessing approximately 2 liters of illegal liquor worth ₹400. The accused pleaded guilty before the court and requested leniency, citing her poor financial circumstances and family responsibilities. The court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹200 fine and imprisonment until the rising of the court, invoking established judicial principles for first-time offenders from economically disadvantaged backgrounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case