Government of Gujarat vs RAMESBHAI KHODABHAI VASAVA — 312/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65aa. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH050005752026

Filing Number

312/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

312/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KAPADVANJ

Judge

5-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

8

Police Station

ATTARSUMBA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65aa

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAMESBHAI KHODABHAI VASAVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court found the accused, Rameshbhai Khodabhai Vasava, guilty under the Prohibition Act Section 65(a)(a) for possessing approximately 2 liters of illicit country liquor valued at ₹400. The court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹200 fine and imprisonment until court closure (with alternative of 1 day imprisonment if fine unpaid), considering the accused's plea of guilt, poor financial circumstances, and family responsibilities under established judicial precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 312/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court found the accused, Rameshbhai Khodabhai Vasava, guilty under the Prohibition Act Section 65(a)(a) for possessing approximately 2 liters of illicit country liquor valued at ₹400. The court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹200 fine and imprisonment until court closure (with alternative of 1 day imprisonment if fine unpaid), considering the accused's plea of guilt, poor financial circumstances, and family responsibilities under established judicial precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case