Government of Gujarat vs PRATAPBHAI AMARABHAI DEVIPUJAK — 311/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65aa. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH050005742026

Filing Number

311/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

311/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KAPADVANJ

Judge

5-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

5

Police Station

ATTARSUMBA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65aa

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRATAPBHAI AMARABHAI DEVIPUJAK

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Additional Chief Judge of Kapadvanj convicted Pratabhai Amarabhai Devipujak under the Prohibition Act, Section 65(A)(A) for possessing approximately 2 liters of illegal country liquor worth ₹400 on January 13, 2026. The court, considering the accused's guilty plea, poor financial circumstances, and family dependents, imposed lenient punishment: a fine of ₹200 with one day imprisonment as default sentence, rather than rigorous punishment, citing precedent from the Gujarat High Court judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 311/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Additional Chief Judge of Kapadvanj convicted Pratabhai Amarabhai Devipujak under the Prohibition Act, Section 65(A)(A) for possessing approximately 2 liters of illegal country liquor worth ₹400 on January 13, 2026. The court, considering the accused's guilty plea, poor financial circumstances, and family dependents, imposed lenient punishment: a fine of ₹200 with one day imprisonment as default sentence, rather than rigorous punishment, citing precedent from the Gujarat High Court judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case