Government of Gujarat vs MAHESHBHAI PRATAPBHAI SOLANKI Advocate - V J SOLANKI — 262/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85(1),66(1)(b). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH050004892026

Filing Number

262/2026

Filing Date

16-Feb-2026

Registration No

262/2026

Registration Date

16-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KAPADVANJ

Judge

3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

502

Police Station

KAPADWANJ TOWN POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85(1),66(1)(b)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MAHESHBHAI PRATAPBHAI SOLANKI Advocate - V J SOLANKI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court found the accused, Maheshbhai Pratapbhai Solanki, guilty under the Gujarat Prohibition Act sections 66.1.B and 85(1) for public intoxication, but imposed lenient punishment considering the accused's guilty plea, poverty, and family responsibilities. The accused was sentenced to a fine of Rs. 100 with imprisonment until the court rises, and an additional 3 days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 16-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 262/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court found the accused, Maheshbhai Pratapbhai Solanki, guilty under the Gujarat Prohibition Act sections 66.1.B and 85(1) for public intoxication, but imposed lenient punishment considering the accused's guilty plea, poverty, and family responsibilities. The accused was sentenced to a fine of Rs. 100 with imprisonment until the court rises, and an additional 3 days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case