Government of Gujarat vs KODARSINH KARANSINH PARMAR Advocate - R N PARMAR — 261/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85(1),66(1)(b). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH050004882026

Filing Number

261/2026

Filing Date

16-Feb-2026

Registration No

261/2026

Registration Date

16-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KAPADVANJ

Judge

3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

478

Police Station

KAPADWANJ TOWN POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85(1),66(1)(b)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KODARSINH KARANSINH PARMAR Advocate - R N PARMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court found the accused, Kodarsingh Karansingh Parmar, guilty under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 66.1.B and 85(1) for public consumption of alcohol and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 100 with imprisonment till the court rises, and an additional three days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. The court applied lenient sentencing principles considering the accused's confession, poverty, and family responsibilities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 16-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 261/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court found the accused, Kodarsingh Karansingh Parmar, guilty under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 66.1.B and 85(1) for public consumption of alcohol and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 100 with imprisonment till the court rises, and an additional three days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. The court applied lenient sentencing principles considering the accused's confession, poverty, and family responsibilities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case