Government of Gujarat vs VINUBHAI VAGHAJIBHAI SOLANKI Advocate - R J PATHAN — 260/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65aa,116(b),81. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH050004872026
Filing Number
260/2026
Filing Date
16-Feb-2026
Registration No
260/2026
Registration Date
16-Feb-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, KAPADVANJ
Judge
3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 23-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11204026250395
Police Station
KAPADWANJ TOWN POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.VINUBHAI VAGHAJIBHAI SOLANKI Advocate - R J PATHAN
-
2.MAHENDRABHAI VIJAYBHAI PARMAR
Adv. R J PATHAN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court found both accused guilty under the Prohibition Act sections 65-A, 116-B, and 81 for possessing sealed bottles of foreign liquor (44 bottles valued at ₹14,300). However, considering the accused's guilty plea, poor financial circumstances, and family responsibilities, the court imposed lenient punishment instead of rigorous imprisonment: each accused was sentenced to pay ₹500 in cash fine plus court costs, with a total fine of ₹1,000; failure to pay would result in 2 days simple imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
09-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
16-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 260/2026
The court found both accused guilty under the Prohibition Act sections 65-A, 116-B, and 81 for possessing sealed bottles of foreign liquor (44 bottles valued at ₹14,300). However, considering the accused's guilty plea, poor financial circumstances, and family responsibilities, the court imposed lenient punishment instead of rigorous imprisonment: each accused was sentenced to pay ₹500 in cash fine plus court costs, with a total fine of ₹1,000; failure to pay would result in 2 days simple imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts