Government of Gujarat vs VINUBHAI VAGHAJIBHAI SOLANKI Advocate - R J PATHAN — 260/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65aa,116(b),81. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH050004872026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

260/2026

Filing Date

16-02-2026

Registration No

260/2026

Registration Date

16-02-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KAPADVANJ

Judge

3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

11204026250395

Police Station

KAPADWANJ TOWN POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65aa,116(b),81

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

VINUBHAI VAGHAJIBHAI SOLANKI Advocate - R J PATHAN

MAHENDRABHAI VIJAYBHAI PARMAR

Adv. R J PATHAN

Hearing History

Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

14-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

16-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

The court found both accused guilty under the Prohibition Act sections 65-A, 116-B, and 81 for possessing sealed bottles of foreign liquor (44 bottles valued at ₹14,300). However, considering the accused's guilty plea, poor financial circumstances, and family responsibilities, the court imposed lenient punishment instead of rigorous imprisonment: each accused was sentenced to pay ₹500 in cash fine plus court costs, with a total fine of ₹1,000; failure to pay would result in 2 days simple imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court found both accused guilty under the Prohibition Act sections 65-A, 116-B, and 81 for possessing sealed bottles of foreign liquor (44 bottles valued at ₹14,300). However, considering the accused's guilty plea, poor financial circumstances, and family responsibilities, the court imposed lenient punishment instead of rigorous imprisonment: each accused was sentenced to pay ₹500 in cash fine plus court costs, with a total fine of ₹1,000; failure to pay would result in 2 days simple imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, KAPADVANJ All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case