Government of Gujarat vs HARMANBHAI MAFATBHAI SOLANKI Advocate - V J SOLANKI — 259/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65aa. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH050004862026

Filing Number

259/2026

Filing Date

16-Feb-2026

Registration No

259/2026

Registration Date

16-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KAPADVANJ

Judge

3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

465

Police Station

KAPADWANJ TOWN POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65aa

Petitioner(s)

1.Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

1.HARMANBHAI MAFATBHAI SOLANKI Advocate - V J SOLANKI

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
14-Mar-2026

OrderView PDF

The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Kapadvanj convicted Haranabhai Fatbhai Solanki under the Prohibition Act Section 65-A for illegally possessing 0.3 liters of country liquor worth ₹60. The court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹100 cash fine and imprisonment until court rising (instead of full punishment) considering the accused's confession, poverty, and family responsibilities, following the principle established in State of Gujarat v. Natvaji Harchandji Thakkar. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
14-Mar-2026

Disposed

Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
09-Mar-2026

Process To Accused

Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
16-Feb-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
16-Feb-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 259/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Kapadvanj convicted Haranabhai Fatbhai Solanki under the Prohibition Act Section 65-A for illegally possessing 0.3 liters of country liquor worth ₹60. The court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹100 cash fine and imprisonment until court rising (instead of full punishment) considering the accused's confession, poverty, and family responsibilities, following the principle established in State of Gujarat v. Natvaji Harchandji Thakkar. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.