Government of Gujarat vs CHANDUBHAI SHANKARBHAI PARMAR(SOLANKI) Advocate - S K PARMAR — 255/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65aa. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH050004822026

Filing Number

255/2026

Filing Date

16-Feb-2026

Registration No

255/2026

Registration Date

16-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KAPADVANJ

Judge

3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

434

Police Station

KAPADWANJ TOWN POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65aa

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CHANDUBHAI SHANKARBHAI PARMAR(SOLANKI) Advocate - S K PARMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court found the accused, Chandubbhai Shankarbhai Parmar, guilty under Section 65-A of the Prohibition Act for possessing 0.3 liters of illicit liquor worth Rs. 60. Considering the accused's guilty plea, poor financial condition, family responsibilities, and remorse expressed in court, the judge imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine and imprisonment until the court rises, with an additional provision of 2 days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 16-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 255/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court found the accused, Chandubbhai Shankarbhai Parmar, guilty under Section 65-A of the Prohibition Act for possessing 0.3 liters of illicit liquor worth Rs. 60. Considering the accused's guilty plea, poor financial condition, family responsibilities, and remorse expressed in court, the judge imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine and imprisonment until the court rises, with an additional provision of 2 days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case