Government of Gujarat vs IMARANALI AKA DHERO HASANALI SAIYAD Advocate - I M MALEK — 254/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65aa. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH050004812026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

254/2026

Filing Date

16-02-2026

Registration No

254/2026

Registration Date

16-02-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KAPADVANJ

Judge

3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

456

Police Station

KAPADWANJ TOWN POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65aa

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

IMARANALI AKA DHERO HASANALI SAIYAD Advocate - I M MALEK

Hearing History

Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

14-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

09-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

16-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Kapadvanj convicted the accused, Irani Ali (also known as Dhero Hasanali Saiyed), under Section 65-A of the Prohibition Act for possessing approximately 0.1 liters of country liquor valued at ₹200. The court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹100 cash fine and imprisonment until the court rises, considering the accused's confession, poor economic status, and family responsibilities, with an alternative of 2 days simple imprisonment if the fine is not paid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Kapadvanj convicted the accused, Irani Ali (also known as Dhero Hasanali Saiyed), under Section 65-A of the Prohibition Act for possessing approximately 0.1 liters of country liquor valued at ₹200. The court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹100 cash fine and imprisonment until the court rises, considering the accused's confession, poor economic status, and family responsibilities, with an alternative of 2 days simple imprisonment if the fine is not paid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, KAPADVANJ All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case