Government of Gujarat vs IMARANALI AKA DHERO HASANALI SAIYAD Advocate - I M MALEK — 254/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65aa. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH050004812026
Filing Number
254/2026
Filing Date
16-Feb-2026
Registration No
254/2026
Registration Date
16-Feb-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, KAPADVANJ
Judge
3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 23-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
456
Police Station
KAPADWANJ TOWN POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.IMARANALI AKA DHERO HASANALI SAIYAD Advocate - I M MALEK
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Kapadvanj convicted the accused, Irani Ali (also known as Dhero Hasanali Saiyed), under Section 65-A of the Prohibition Act for possessing approximately 0.1 liters of country liquor valued at ₹200. The court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹100 cash fine and imprisonment until the court rises, considering the accused's confession, poor economic status, and family responsibilities, with an alternative of 2 days simple imprisonment if the fine is not paid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
12-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
09-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
16-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 254/2026
The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Kapadvanj convicted the accused, Irani Ali (also known as Dhero Hasanali Saiyed), under Section 65-A of the Prohibition Act for possessing approximately 0.1 liters of country liquor valued at ₹200. The court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹100 cash fine and imprisonment until the court rises, considering the accused's confession, poor economic status, and family responsibilities, with an alternative of 2 days simple imprisonment if the fine is not paid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts