Government of Gujarat vs SAAMANTBHAI @ GATLO RAMANBHAI ZALA Advocate - B T SOLANKI — 252/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65aa. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH050004792026

Filing Number

252/2026

Filing Date

16-Feb-2026

Registration No

252/2026

Registration Date

16-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KAPADVANJ

Judge

3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

370

Police Station

KAPADWANJ TOWN POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65aa

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SAAMANTBHAI @ GATLO RAMANBHAI ZALA Advocate - B T SOLANKI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Kapadvanj convicted the accused Sambhubhai (alias Gattlo) under the Prohibition Act Section 65-A for illegally possessing 0.3 liters of country liquor worth Rs. 60. The court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine and imprisonment until the rising of the court, considering the accused's confession, poverty, and family circumstances, with an alternative punishment of 2 days simple imprisonment if the fine is not paid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 16-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 252/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Kapadvanj convicted the accused Sambhubhai (alias Gattlo) under the Prohibition Act Section 65-A for illegally possessing 0.3 liters of country liquor worth Rs. 60. The court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine and imprisonment until the rising of the court, considering the accused's confession, poverty, and family circumstances, with an alternative punishment of 2 days simple imprisonment if the fine is not paid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case