Government of Gujarat vs MAHENDRABHAI LAXMANBHAI SOLANKI Advocate - J A KURESHI — 251/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65aa. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH050004782026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
251/2026
Filing Date
16-02-2026
Registration No
251/2026
Registration Date
16-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, KAPADVANJ
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
399
Police Station
KAPADWANJ TOWN POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
MAHENDRABHAI LAXMANBHAI SOLANKI Advocate - J A KURESHI
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 13-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 09-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 16-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Kapadvanj found the accused, Mehulbhai Lakshmanabhai Solankhi, guilty under the Prohibition Act Section 65-A for possession of 0.5 liters of illicit liquor valued at Rs. 100. The court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine and imprisonment until the rising of court, considering the accused's confession, poor economic condition, and family circumstances, with an additional 2-day simple imprisonment penalty if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Kapadvanj found the accused, Mehulbhai Lakshmanabhai Solankhi, guilty under the Prohibition Act Section 65-A for possession of 0.5 liters of illicit liquor valued at Rs. 100. The court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine and imprisonment until the rising of court, considering the accused's confession, poor economic condition, and family circumstances, with an additional 2-day simple imprisonment penalty if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts