Government of Gujarat vs MAHENDRABHAI LAXMANBHAI SOLANKI Advocate - J A KURESHI — 251/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65aa. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH050004782026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

251/2026

Filing Date

16-02-2026

Registration No

251/2026

Registration Date

16-02-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KAPADVANJ

Judge

3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

399

Police Station

KAPADWANJ TOWN POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65aa

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

MAHENDRABHAI LAXMANBHAI SOLANKI Advocate - J A KURESHI

Hearing History

Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

14-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

09-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

16-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Kapadvanj found the accused, Mehulbhai Lakshmanabhai Solankhi, guilty under the Prohibition Act Section 65-A for possession of 0.5 liters of illicit liquor valued at Rs. 100. The court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine and imprisonment until the rising of court, considering the accused's confession, poor economic condition, and family circumstances, with an additional 2-day simple imprisonment penalty if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Kapadvanj found the accused, Mehulbhai Lakshmanabhai Solankhi, guilty under the Prohibition Act Section 65-A for possession of 0.5 liters of illicit liquor valued at Rs. 100. The court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine and imprisonment until the rising of court, considering the accused's confession, poor economic condition, and family circumstances, with an additional 2-day simple imprisonment penalty if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, KAPADVANJ All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case