Government of Gujarat vs MAHENDRABHAI LAXMANBHAI SOLANKI Advocate - J A KURESHI — 251/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65aa. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH050004782026
Filing Number
251/2026
Filing Date
16-Feb-2026
Registration No
251/2026
Registration Date
16-Feb-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, KAPADVANJ
Judge
3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 23-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
399
Police Station
KAPADWANJ TOWN POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.MAHENDRABHAI LAXMANBHAI SOLANKI Advocate - J A KURESHI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Kapadvanj found the accused, Mehulbhai Lakshmanabhai Solankhi, guilty under the Prohibition Act Section 65-A for possession of 0.5 liters of illicit liquor valued at Rs. 100. The court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine and imprisonment until the rising of court, considering the accused's confession, poor economic condition, and family circumstances, with an additional 2-day simple imprisonment penalty if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
09-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
16-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 251/2026
The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Kapadvanj found the accused, Mehulbhai Lakshmanabhai Solankhi, guilty under the Prohibition Act Section 65-A for possession of 0.5 liters of illicit liquor valued at Rs. 100. The court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine and imprisonment until the rising of court, considering the accused's confession, poor economic condition, and family circumstances, with an additional 2-day simple imprisonment penalty if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts