Government of Gujarat vs DINESHKUMAR SHANTILAL PARMAR Advocate - F N MIRZA — 244/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285,. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH050004692026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
244/2026
Filing Date
16-02-2026
Registration No
244/2026
Registration Date
16-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, KAPADVANJ
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
528
Police Station
KAPADWANJ TOWN POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
DINESHKUMAR SHANTILAL PARMAR Advocate - F N MIRZA
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 16-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court found the accused Dineshkumar Shantilal Parmar guilty under IPC Sections 285, 102, and 117, and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 500 with 5 days simple imprisonment in default of payment. The court considered the accused's voluntary confession, poor socioeconomic circumstances, and remorse as mitigating factors while imposing minimum punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court found the accused Dineshkumar Shantilal Parmar guilty under IPC Sections 285, 102, and 117, and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 500 with 5 days simple imprisonment in default of payment. The court considered the accused's voluntary confession, poor socioeconomic circumstances, and remorse as mitigating factors while imposing minimum punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts