Government of Gujarat vs MOHMAD JUNEDALI JAKIRALI SAIYAD Advocate - N U SAIYAD — 243/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH050004672026

Filing Number

243/2026

Filing Date

16-Feb-2026

Registration No

243/2026

Registration Date

16-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KAPADVANJ

Judge

3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

522

Police Station

KAPADWANJ TOWN POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285
Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 102,117

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MOHMAD JUNEDALI JAKIRALI SAIYAD Advocate - N U SAIYAD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The court found the accused, Mohammad Junedali Zakir Bhai Saiyed, guilty under BNS Section 275 and GP Act Sections 102, 117, and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 500 with a default imprisonment of 5 days. The court considered the accused's voluntary confession in Lok Adalat, his impoverished circumstances, and family responsibilities as mitigating factors warranting minimum punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 16-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 243/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court found the accused, Mohammad Junedali Zakir Bhai Saiyed, guilty under BNS Section 275 and GP Act Sections 102, 117, and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 500 with a default imprisonment of 5 days. The court considered the accused's voluntary confession in Lok Adalat, his impoverished circumstances, and family responsibilities as mitigating factors warranting minimum punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case