Government of Gujarat vs NILESHKUMAR AMARSINH THAKOR Advocate - F N MIRZA — 242/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH050004662026

Filing Number

242/2026

Filing Date

16-Feb-2026

Registration No

242/2026

Registration Date

16-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KAPADVANJ

Judge

3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

490

Police Station

KAPADWANJ TOWN POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285
Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 102,117

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NILESHKUMAR AMARSINH THAKOR Advocate - F N MIRZA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Lok Adalat (People's Court) convicted defendant Nileshkumar Amarsingh Thakor under BNS Section 275 and IPC Sections 285 and 117 for a criminal offense. The court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 500 fine considering the accused's guilty plea, poverty, and family responsibilities, with an alternative of 5 days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 16-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 242/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Lok Adalat (People's Court) convicted defendant Nileshkumar Amarsingh Thakor under BNS Section 275 and IPC Sections 285 and 117 for a criminal offense. The court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 500 fine considering the accused's guilty plea, poverty, and family responsibilities, with an alternative of 5 days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case