AMBICA SALES NA PRO - PATEL JIGNESHBHAI MAHENDRABHAI vs UMIYA ENTERPRIZE NA PRO - MANSUKHBHAI MANGALBHAI PATEL Advocate - I M MALEK — 325/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH050004652024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
325/2024
Filing Date
06-03-2024
Registration No
325/2024
Registration Date
06-03-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, KAPADVANJ
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
AMBICA SALES NA PRO - PATEL JIGNESHBHAI MAHENDRABHAI
Adv. D J SHARMA
Respondent(s)
UMIYA ENTERPRIZE NA PRO - MANSUKHBHAI MANGALBHAI PATEL Advocate - I M MALEK
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 11-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 09-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 04-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 09-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court accepted the complainant's withdrawal petition and dismissed the case. The accused was acquitted of the charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, as the parties had reached a settlement and the complainant no longer wished to pursue the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court accepted the complainant's withdrawal petition and dismissed the case. The accused was acquitted of the charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, as the parties had reached a settlement and the complainant no longer wished to pursue the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts