Government of Gujarat vs IMARANBHAI SAHIDBHAI CHAUHAN Advocate - F N MIRZA — 212/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85(1),66(1)(b). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH050004202026

Filing Number

212/2026

Filing Date

11-Feb-2026

Registration No

212/2026

Registration Date

11-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KAPADVANJ

Judge

3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 16-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85(1),66(1)(b)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.IMARANBHAI SAHIDBHAI CHAUHAN Advocate - F N MIRZA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court found the accused, Imranbhai Sahidlbhai Chouhan, guilty under the Gujarat Prohibition Act sections 66.1.B and 85(1) for consuming and publicly displaying alcohol. The court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine and imprisonment until the conclusion of the court proceedings, with an additional provision of 3 days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid, citing the accused's confession, poor financial condition, and family responsibilities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 11-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 11-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 212/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court found the accused, Imranbhai Sahidlbhai Chouhan, guilty under the Gujarat Prohibition Act sections 66.1.B and 85(1) for consuming and publicly displaying alcohol. The court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine and imprisonment until the conclusion of the court proceedings, with an additional provision of 3 days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid, citing the accused's confession, poor financial condition, and family responsibilities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case