Government of Gujarat vs AJAYBHAI MANGAJI MARVADI Advocate - V J PATEL — 191/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185,. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH050003812026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

191/2026

Filing Date

10-02-2026

Registration No

191/2026

Registration Date

10-02-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KAPADVANJ

Judge

3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

439

Police Station

KAPADWANJ TOWN POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 185,

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

AJAYBHAI MANGAJI MARVADI Advocate - V J PATEL

Hearing History

Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

14-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

09-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

10-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Kapadwanj convicted the accused Ajaybhai Manglaji Marwadi under Section 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act for drunk driving on November 23, 2025, and sentenced him to a fine of ₹3,500 with imprisonment until court rising, or 2 days simple imprisonment in default of fine payment. The court considered the accused's voluntary confession, poor financial status, and family responsibilities as mitigating factors in awarding lenient punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Kapadwanj convicted the accused Ajaybhai Manglaji Marwadi under Section 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act for drunk driving on November 23, 2025, and sentenced him to a fine of ₹3,500 with imprisonment until court rising, or 2 days simple imprisonment in default of fine payment. The court considered the accused's voluntary confession, poor financial status, and family responsibilities as mitigating factors in awarding lenient punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, KAPADVANJ All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case