Government of Gujarat vs PRAKASHBHAI RAMESHBHAI PARMAR Advocate - P V CHAUHAN — 189/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85(1),66(1)(b). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH050003792026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

189/2026

Filing Date

10-02-2026

Registration No

189/2026

Registration Date

10-02-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KAPADVANJ

Judge

3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

451

Police Station

KAPADWANJ TOWN POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 85(1),66(1)(b)

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

PRAKASHBHAI RAMESHBHAI PARMAR Advocate - P V CHAUHAN

Hearing History

Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

14-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

09-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

10-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Kapadvanj convicted the accused, Prakashbhai Reshbhai Paramar, under Section 66.1.B and 85(1) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for publicly consuming alcohol. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 100 and imprisonment until the rising of court, with an additional 3 days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid, applying the leniency principle due to the accused's admission of guilt and impoverished circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Kapadvanj convicted the accused, Prakashbhai Reshbhai Paramar, under Section 66.1.B and 85(1) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for publicly consuming alcohol. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 100 and imprisonment until the rising of court, with an additional 3 days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid, applying the leniency principle due to the accused's admission of guilt and impoverished circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, KAPADVANJ All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case