Government of Gujarat vs PRAKASHBHAI RAMESHBHAI PARMAR Advocate - P V CHAUHAN — 189/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85(1),66(1)(b). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH050003792026
Filing Number
189/2026
Filing Date
10-Feb-2026
Registration No
189/2026
Registration Date
10-Feb-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, KAPADVANJ
Judge
3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 23-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
451
Police Station
KAPADWANJ TOWN POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.PRAKASHBHAI RAMESHBHAI PARMAR Advocate - P V CHAUHAN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Kapadvanj convicted the accused, Prakashbhai Reshbhai Paramar, under Section 66.1.B and 85(1) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for publicly consuming alcohol. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 100 and imprisonment until the rising of court, with an additional 3 days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid, applying the leniency principle due to the accused's admission of guilt and impoverished circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
09-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
10-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 189/2026
The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Kapadvanj convicted the accused, Prakashbhai Reshbhai Paramar, under Section 66.1.B and 85(1) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for publicly consuming alcohol. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 100 and imprisonment until the rising of court, with an additional 3 days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid, applying the leniency principle due to the accused's admission of guilt and impoverished circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts