Government of Gujarat vs NAGINBHAI BABABHAI PARMAR Advocate - H M JOSHI — 187/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85(1),66(1)(b). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH050003772026
Filing Number
187/2026
Filing Date
10-Feb-2026
Registration No
187/2026
Registration Date
10-Feb-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, KAPADVANJ
Judge
3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 23-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
403
Police Station
KAPADWANJ TOWN POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.NAGINBHAI BABABHAI PARMAR Advocate - H M JOSHI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Kapadwanj found the accused, Naginbhai Babalbhai Parmar, guilty under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Sections 66.1.B and 85(1) for consuming and publicly displaying alcohol. The court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 100 with imprisonment until court rising, and an additional 3 days simple imprisonment in default of payment, applying lenient sentencing considering the accused's guilty plea, poverty, and family circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
09-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
10-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 187/2026
Case Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Kapadwanj found the accused, Naginbhai Babalbhai Parmar, guilty under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Sections 66.1.B and 85(1) for consuming and publicly displaying alcohol. The court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 100 with imprisonment until court rising, and an additional 3 days simple imprisonment in default of payment, applying lenient sentencing considering the accused's guilty plea, poverty, and family circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts