Government of Gujarat vs SURESHBHAI BABUBHAI PARMAR Advocate - P V CHAUHAN — 186/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85(1),66(1)(b). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH050003762026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

186/2026

Filing Date

10-02-2026

Registration No

186/2026

Registration Date

10-02-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KAPADVANJ

Judge

3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

393

Police Station

KAPADWANJ TOWN POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 85(1),66(1)(b)

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

SURESHBHAI BABUBHAI PARMAR Advocate - P V CHAUHAN

Hearing History

Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

14-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

09-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

10-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

Summary In Criminal Case No. 186/2026, the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kapadvanj, convicted the accused Sureshbhai Babulbhai Parmar under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Sections 66.1.B and 85(1) for public intoxication and drinking alcohol. The court found the accused guilty and, considering his poor financial condition and family circumstances along with his guilty plea, imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine under Section 275 BNS, with three days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In Criminal Case No. 186/2026, the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kapadvanj, convicted the accused Sureshbhai Babulbhai Parmar under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Sections 66.1.B and 85(1) for public intoxication and drinking alcohol. The court found the accused guilty and, considering his poor financial condition and family circumstances along with his guilty plea, imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine under Section 275 BNS, with three days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, KAPADVANJ All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case