Government of Gujarat vs SURESHBHAI BABUBHAI PARMAR Advocate - P V CHAUHAN — 186/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85(1),66(1)(b). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH050003762026
Filing Number
186/2026
Filing Date
10-Feb-2026
Registration No
186/2026
Registration Date
10-Feb-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, KAPADVANJ
Judge
3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 23-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
393
Police Station
KAPADWANJ TOWN POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.SURESHBHAI BABUBHAI PARMAR Advocate - P V CHAUHAN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary In Criminal Case No. 186/2026, the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kapadvanj, convicted the accused Sureshbhai Babulbhai Parmar under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Sections 66.1.B and 85(1) for public intoxication and drinking alcohol. The court found the accused guilty and, considering his poor financial condition and family circumstances along with his guilty plea, imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine under Section 275 BNS, with three days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
09-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
10-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 186/2026
Summary In Criminal Case No. 186/2026, the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kapadvanj, convicted the accused Sureshbhai Babulbhai Parmar under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Sections 66.1.B and 85(1) for public intoxication and drinking alcohol. The court found the accused guilty and, considering his poor financial condition and family circumstances along with his guilty plea, imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine under Section 275 BNS, with three days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts