Government of Gujarat vs SANJAYBHAI AKA BAKARI MELABHAI DABHI Advocate - J A KURESHI — 182/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85(1),66(1)(b). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH050003722026
Filing Number
182/2026
Filing Date
10-Feb-2026
Registration No
182/2026
Registration Date
10-Feb-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, KAPADVANJ
Judge
3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 23-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
476
Police Station
KAPADWANJ TOWN POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.SANJAYBHAI AKA BAKARI MELABHAI DABHI Advocate - J A KURESHI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Kapadvanj convicted the accused Sanjaybhai for public intoxication under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 66.1(B) and 85(1), after the accused pleaded guilty. The court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine and imprisonment until court closure instead of full punishment, considering the accused's poor economic condition and family responsibilities, with an additional provision of 3 days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
12-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
09-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
10-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 182/2026
The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Kapadvanj convicted the accused Sanjaybhai for public intoxication under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 66.1(B) and 85(1), after the accused pleaded guilty. The court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine and imprisonment until court closure instead of full punishment, considering the accused's poor economic condition and family responsibilities, with an additional provision of 3 days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts