Government of Gujarat vs KADABHAI HATHIBHAI PARMAR Advocate - V J SOLANKI — 181/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85(1),66(1)(b). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH050003712026

Filing Number

181/2026

Filing Date

10-Feb-2026

Registration No

181/2026

Registration Date

10-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KAPADVANJ

Judge

3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

409

Police Station

KAPADWANJ TOWN POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85(1),66(1)(b)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KADABHAI HATHIBHAI PARMAR Advocate - V J SOLANKI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    Summary The court found the accused, Kalaabhai Hathibhai Paramar, guilty under the Gujarat Prohibition Act sections 66.1.B and 85(1) for public drinking. The court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 100 with imprisonment until the court rises, and an additional 3 days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid, citing the accused's admission of guilt and applying lenient sentencing principles given his poor economic circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 10-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 10-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 181/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court found the accused, Kalaabhai Hathibhai Paramar, guilty under the Gujarat Prohibition Act sections 66.1.B and 85(1) for public drinking. The court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 100 with imprisonment until the court rises, and an additional 3 days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid, citing the accused's admission of guilt and applying lenient sentencing principles given his poor economic circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case