Government of Gujarat vs SURAJ AKA ANILBHAI SHANTILAL MARVADI — 178/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85(1),66(1)(b). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH050003682026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
178/2026
Filing Date
10-02-2026
Registration No
178/2026
Registration Date
10-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, KAPADVANJ
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
458
Police Station
KAPADWANJ TOWN POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
SURAJ AKA ANILBHAI SHANTILAL MARVADI
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 13-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 09-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 10-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Kapadvanj convicted the accused Suraj Urf Anilbhai under the Gujarat Prohibition Act sections 66.1.B and 85(1) for public intoxication, but imposed a lenient sentence of ₹100 cash fine and imprisonment until court rising instead of rigorous punishment, considering the accused's guilty plea, poor economic condition, and family responsibilities. If the fine remains unpaid, the accused will serve 3 days simple imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Kapadvanj convicted the accused Suraj Urf Anilbhai under the Gujarat Prohibition Act sections 66.1.B and 85(1) for public intoxication, but imposed a lenient sentence of ₹100 cash fine and imprisonment until court rising instead of rigorous punishment, considering the accused's guilty plea, poor economic condition, and family responsibilities. If the fine remains unpaid, the accused will serve 3 days simple imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts