Government of Gujarat vs SANJAYKUMAR JYNTIBHAI PARMAR Advocate - M B VAGHELA — 174/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65aa. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH050003642026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
174/2026
Filing Date
10-02-2026
Registration No
174/2026
Registration Date
10-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, KAPADVANJ
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
421
Police Station
KAPADWANJ TOWN POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
SANJAYKUMAR JYNTIBHAI PARMAR Advocate - M B VAGHELA
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 13-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 09-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 10-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court found the accused, Sanjaykumar Jayantibhai Parmar, guilty under the Prohibition Act Section 65(A) for possessing approximately 0.2 liters of illicit liquor worth Rs. 40. Considering the accused's guilty plea, poor financial condition, and family circumstances, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine and imprisonment until the court rises, with an alternative sentence of 2 days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court found the accused, Sanjaykumar Jayantibhai Parmar, guilty under the Prohibition Act Section 65(A) for possessing approximately 0.2 liters of illicit liquor worth Rs. 40. Considering the accused's guilty plea, poor financial condition, and family circumstances, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine and imprisonment until the court rises, with an alternative sentence of 2 days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts