Government of Gujarat vs RANJITBHAI AKA RANGO PRATAPBHAI BARAIYA Advocate - D J PRAJAPATI — 173/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65aa. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH050003632026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
173/2026
Filing Date
10-02-2026
Registration No
173/2026
Registration Date
10-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, KAPADVANJ
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
6
Police Station
KAPADWANJ TOWN POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
RANJITBHAI AKA RANGO PRATAPBHAI BARAIYA Advocate - D J PRAJAPATI
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 13-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 09-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 10-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Kapadvanj convicted the accused Ranjitbhai Urf Rango under the Prohibition Act Section 65-A for illegally possessing 0.4 liters of country liquor worth Rs. 800/-. The court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100/- cash fine and imprisonment until court rising, considering the accused's confession, poverty, and family responsibilities, with an alternative of 2 days simple imprisonment if the fine is not paid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Kapadvanj convicted the accused Ranjitbhai Urf Rango under the Prohibition Act Section 65-A for illegally possessing 0.4 liters of country liquor worth Rs. 800/-. The court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100/- cash fine and imprisonment until court rising, considering the accused's confession, poverty, and family responsibilities, with an alternative of 2 days simple imprisonment if the fine is not paid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts