Government of Gujarat vs RANJITBHAI AKA RANGO PRATAPBHAI BARAIYA Advocate - D J PRAJAPATI — 173/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65aa. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH050003632026
Filing Number
173/2026
Filing Date
10-Feb-2026
Registration No
173/2026
Registration Date
10-Feb-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, KAPADVANJ
Judge
3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 23-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
6
Police Station
KAPADWANJ TOWN POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.RANJITBHAI AKA RANGO PRATAPBHAI BARAIYA Advocate - D J PRAJAPATI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Kapadvanj convicted the accused Ranjitbhai Urf Rango under the Prohibition Act Section 65-A for illegally possessing 0.4 liters of country liquor worth Rs. 800/-. The court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100/- cash fine and imprisonment until court rising, considering the accused's confession, poverty, and family responsibilities, with an alternative of 2 days simple imprisonment if the fine is not paid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
09-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
10-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 173/2026
Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Kapadvanj convicted the accused Ranjitbhai Urf Rango under the Prohibition Act Section 65-A for illegally possessing 0.4 liters of country liquor worth Rs. 800/-. The court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100/- cash fine and imprisonment until court rising, considering the accused's confession, poverty, and family responsibilities, with an alternative of 2 days simple imprisonment if the fine is not paid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts