Government of Gujarat vs RANJITBHAI AKA RANGO PRATAPBHAI BARAIYA Advocate - D J PRAJAPATI — 173/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65aa. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH050003632026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

173/2026

Filing Date

10-02-2026

Registration No

173/2026

Registration Date

10-02-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KAPADVANJ

Judge

3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

6

Police Station

KAPADWANJ TOWN POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65aa

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

RANJITBHAI AKA RANGO PRATAPBHAI BARAIYA Advocate - D J PRAJAPATI

Hearing History

Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

14-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

09-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

10-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Kapadvanj convicted the accused Ranjitbhai Urf Rango under the Prohibition Act Section 65-A for illegally possessing 0.4 liters of country liquor worth Rs. 800/-. The court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100/- cash fine and imprisonment until court rising, considering the accused's confession, poverty, and family responsibilities, with an alternative of 2 days simple imprisonment if the fine is not paid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Kapadvanj convicted the accused Ranjitbhai Urf Rango under the Prohibition Act Section 65-A for illegally possessing 0.4 liters of country liquor worth Rs. 800/-. The court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100/- cash fine and imprisonment until court rising, considering the accused's confession, poverty, and family responsibilities, with an alternative of 2 days simple imprisonment if the fine is not paid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, KAPADVANJ All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case