Government of Gujarat vs SIKANDARMIYA JIVAMIYA KURESI Advocate - M M SHAIKH — 193/2021
Case under Public Gambling Act, 1867 [section 1 18] Section 12. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 16th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH050002742021
Filing Number
193/2021
Filing Date
05-02-2021
Registration No
193/2021
Registration Date
05-02-2021
Court
TALUKA COURT, KAPADVANJ
Judge
5-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
16
Police Station
KAPADWANJ RURAL POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
SIKANDARMIYA JIVAMIYA KURESI Advocate - M M SHAIKH
Hearing History
Judge: 5-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 02-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 23-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 12-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 22-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: C.C. NO.193/2021 The court acquitted the accused under IPC Section 12 (relating to gambling offenses) due to insufficient evidence. While the prosecution presented witness testimonies from police officers, key witnesses failed to corroborate critical facts—particularly regarding a panchayat (formal inquiry) document that was essential to establish the offense. The court found that without independent witness support and proper documentation, the prosecution's case lacked sufficient strength to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: C.C. NO.193/2021 The court acquitted the accused under IPC Section 12 (relating to gambling offenses) due to insufficient evidence. While the prosecution presented witness testimonies from police officers, key witnesses failed to corroborate critical facts—particularly regarding a panchayat (formal inquiry) document that was essential to establish the offense. The court found that without independent witness support and proper documentation, the prosecution's case lacked sufficient strength to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts