Government of Gujarat vs SIKANDARMIYA JIVAMIYA KURESI Advocate - M M SHAIKH — 193/2021
Case under Public Gambling Act, 1867 [Section 1 18] Section 12. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 16th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH050002742021
Filing Number
193/2021
Filing Date
05-Feb-2021
Registration No
193/2021
Registration Date
05-Feb-2021
Court
TALUKA COURT, KAPADVANJ
Judge
5-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
16
Police Station
KAPADWANJ RURAL POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.SIKANDARMIYA JIVAMIYA KURESI Advocate - M M SHAIKH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: C.C. NO.193/2021 The court acquitted the accused under IPC Section 12 (relating to gambling offenses) due to insufficient evidence. While the prosecution presented witness testimonies from police officers, key witnesses failed to corroborate critical facts—particularly regarding a panchayat (formal inquiry) document that was essential to establish the offense. The court found that without independent witness support and proper documentation, the prosecution's case lacked sufficient strength to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
02-Mar-2026
Judgement
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
23-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
12-Feb-2026
Further Statement
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
22-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
05-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
02-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
10-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
16-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
23-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
01-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
19-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
24-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
14-May-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
18-Feb-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
20-Nov-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
31-Aug-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
25-Jun-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
27-Mar-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
03-Jan-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
06-Oct-2023
Process To Accused
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
17-Jul-2023
Process To Accused
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
28-Apr-2023
Process To Accused
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
14-Feb-2023
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Nov-2022
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Sep-2022
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-Jun-2022
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Mar-2022
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Dec-2021
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Oct-2021
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Aug-2021
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-May-2021
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Feb-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Feb-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 193/2021
Case Summary: C.C. NO.193/2021 The court acquitted the accused under IPC Section 12 (relating to gambling offenses) due to insufficient evidence. While the prosecution presented witness testimonies from police officers, key witnesses failed to corroborate critical facts—particularly regarding a panchayat (formal inquiry) document that was essential to establish the offense. The court found that without independent witness support and proper documentation, the prosecution's case lacked sufficient strength to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts