GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs NAVINKUMAR AKA BHURO DALPATSINH ZALA — 81/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65aa. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH050001142026

Filing Number

81/2026

Filing Date

13-Jan-2026

Registration No

81/2026

Registration Date

13-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KAPADVANJ

Judge

5-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

234

Police Station

ATTARSUMBA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65aa

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NAVINKUMAR AKA BHURO DALPATSINH ZALA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court found the accused, Navinbhaimath Dalpat Singh Jhala, guilty under the Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A) for possessing approximately 2 liters of country liquor valued at Rs. 400. Instead of imposing the full sentence, the court imposed a lenient punishment of Rs. 200 fine and imprisonment until court rising, citing the accused's poor family circumstances and full confession, in accordance with judicial precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 13-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 81/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court found the accused, Navinbhaimath Dalpat Singh Jhala, guilty under the Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A) for possessing approximately 2 liters of country liquor valued at Rs. 400. Instead of imposing the full sentence, the court imposed a lenient punishment of Rs. 200 fine and imprisonment until court rising, citing the accused's poor family circumstances and full confession, in accordance with judicial precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case