GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs BUDHABHAI NATHABHAI BAJANIYA — 77/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65aa. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH050001102026

Filing Number

77/2026

Filing Date

13-Jan-2026

Registration No

77/2026

Registration Date

13-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KAPADVANJ

Judge

5-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

168

Police Station

ATTARSUMBA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65aa

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BUDHABHAI NATHABHAI BAJANIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    Summary The court convicted the accused, Budhabhai Nathabhai Bajaniya, under the Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A) for possessing approximately 2 liters of illicit liquor worth ₹400. Despite proving the charge, the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹200 fine and time served, rather than full imprisonment, considering the accused's impoverished background and family circumstances, following judicial precedent for leniency in such cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 13-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 77/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court convicted the accused, Budhabhai Nathabhai Bajaniya, under the Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A) for possessing approximately 2 liters of illicit liquor worth ₹400. Despite proving the charge, the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹200 fine and time served, rather than full imprisonment, considering the accused's impoverished background and family circumstances, following judicial precedent for leniency in such cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case