GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs MANSINH VAJESINH CHAUHAN — 75/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85(1),66(1)(b). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH050001082026

Filing Number

75/2026

Filing Date

13-Jan-2026

Registration No

75/2026

Registration Date

13-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KAPADVANJ

Judge

5-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

229

Police Station

ATTARSUMBA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85(1),66(1)(b)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MANSINH VAJESINH CHAUHAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court found the accused Mansinh Vajsinh Chauhan guilty under the Prohibition Act sections 85(1) and 66(1)(b) for consuming alcohol without permit in a public place. Considering the accused's plea of guilt, poor socioeconomic background as sole earner, remorse, and commitment to reform, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 200 fine and time already served in custody, with one day's simple imprisonment as alternative in case of non-payment of fine. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 13-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 75/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court found the accused Mansinh Vajsinh Chauhan guilty under the Prohibition Act sections 85(1) and 66(1)(b) for consuming alcohol without permit in a public place. Considering the accused's plea of guilt, poor socioeconomic background as sole earner, remorse, and commitment to reform, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 200 fine and time already served in custody, with one day's simple imprisonment as alternative in case of non-payment of fine. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case