GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs RANJITSINH DIPSINH ZALA — 74/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85(1),66(1)(b). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH050001072026

Filing Number

74/2026

Filing Date

13-Jan-2026

Registration No

74/2026

Registration Date

13-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KAPADVANJ

Judge

5-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

233

Police Station

ATTARSUMBA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85(1),66(1)(b)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RANJITSINH DIPSINH ZALA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kapadvanj convicted Ranjitsinh Dipsinh Jhala under the Prohibition Act sections 85(1) and 66(1)(b) for consuming alcohol without permit and being found with liquor in a public place. The court sentenced him to a fine of ₹200 with imprisonment until court rises, and additional one day simple imprisonment in case of non-payment, considering his guilty plea, poor socioeconomic status, remorse, and assurance against future offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 13-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 74/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kapadvanj convicted Ranjitsinh Dipsinh Jhala under the Prohibition Act sections 85(1) and 66(1)(b) for consuming alcohol without permit and being found with liquor in a public place. The court sentenced him to a fine of ₹200 with imprisonment until court rises, and additional one day simple imprisonment in case of non-payment, considering his guilty plea, poor socioeconomic status, remorse, and assurance against future offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case