JANA SMALL FINANCE BANK LTD. NA AUTHORISED PERSON - TUSHAR PATEL vs MALEK FARIDMOHAMMD FAKIRMOHAMMAD — 1/2026

Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Section 14. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 16th April 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION JMFC

CNR: GJKH050000092026

Filing Number

1/2026

Filing Date

02-Jan-2026

Registration No

1/2026

Registration Date

02-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KAPADVANJ

Judge

5-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

16-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Section 14

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JANA SMALL FINANCE BANK LTD. NA AUTHORISED PERSON - TUSHAR PATEL

    Adv. M D JOGANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MALEK FARIDMOHAMMD FAKIRMOHAMMAD

  2. 2.MALEK RASHIDABANU

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: JANA SMALL FINANCE BANK LTD. vs. MALEK FARIDMOHAMMD FAKIRMOHAMMAD Court Decision: The court allowed Jana Small Finance Bank's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, and appointed an advocate commissioner to take possession of the secured agricultural property in Kheda district. The borrowers defaulted on their loan, and after issuing a demand notice and symbolic possession notice, the bank sought physical possession with police assistance if necessary. Key Reasoning: The court found that all statutory requirements were met—the bank is a registered secured creditor, proper notice was issued under Section 13(2), and symbolic possession was published in newspapers. The court imposed conditions requiring the bank to deposit ₹15,000 as commissioner remuneration and directed the commissioner to prepare a panchnama before handing over possession to the bank. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 04-Apr-2026

    Process To Opponent

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 30-Mar-2026

    Process To Opponent

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Process To Opponent

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  7. 21-Feb-2026

    Process To Opponent

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  8. 20-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 02-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: JANA SMALL FINANCE BANK LTD. vs. MALEK FARIDMOHAMMD FAKIRMOHAMMAD Court Decision: The court allowed Jana Small Finance Bank's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, and appointed an advocate commissioner to take possession of the secured agricultural property in Kheda district. The borrowers defaulted on their loan, and after issuing a demand notice and symbolic possession notice, the bank sought physical possession with police assistance if necessary. Key Reasoning: The court found that all statutory requirements were met—the bank is a registered secured creditor, proper notice was issued under Section 13(2), and symbolic possession was published in newspapers. The court imposed conditions requiring the bank to deposit ₹15,000 as commissioner remuneration and directed the commissioner to prepare a panchnama before handing over possession to the bank. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case