JANA SMALL FINANCE BANK LTD. NA AUTHORISED PERSON - TUSHAR PATEL vs MALEK FARIDMOHAMMD FAKIRMOHAMMAD — 1/2026
Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Section 14. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 16th April 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION JMFC
CNR: GJKH050000092026
Filing Number
1/2026
Filing Date
02-01-2026
Registration No
1/2026
Registration Date
02-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, KAPADVANJ
Judge
5-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
16th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JANA SMALL FINANCE BANK LTD. NA AUTHORISED PERSON - TUSHAR PATEL
Adv. M D JOGANI
Respondent(s)
MALEK FARIDMOHAMMD FAKIRMOHAMMAD
MALEK RASHIDABANU
Hearing History
Judge: 5-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
PROCESS TO OPPONENT
PROCESS TO OPPONENT
PROCESS TO OPPONENT
PROCESS TO OPPONENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 04-04-2026 | PROCESS TO OPPONENT |
| 30-03-2026 | PROCESS TO OPPONENT |
| 12-03-2026 | PROCESS TO OPPONENT |
| 21-02-2026 | PROCESS TO OPPONENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: JANA SMALL FINANCE BANK LTD. vs. MALEK FARIDMOHAMMD FAKIRMOHAMMAD Court Decision: The court allowed Jana Small Finance Bank's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, and appointed an advocate commissioner to take possession of the secured agricultural property in Kheda district. The borrowers defaulted on their loan, and after issuing a demand notice and symbolic possession notice, the bank sought physical possession with police assistance if necessary. Key Reasoning: The court found that all statutory requirements were met—the bank is a registered secured creditor, proper notice was issued under Section 13(2), and symbolic possession was published in newspapers. The court imposed conditions requiring the bank to deposit ₹15,000 as commissioner remuneration and directed the commissioner to prepare a panchnama before handing over possession to the bank. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: JANA SMALL FINANCE BANK LTD. vs. MALEK FARIDMOHAMMD FAKIRMOHAMMAD Court Decision: The court allowed Jana Small Finance Bank's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, and appointed an advocate commissioner to take possession of the secured agricultural property in Kheda district. The borrowers defaulted on their loan, and after issuing a demand notice and symbolic possession notice, the bank sought physical possession with police assistance if necessary. Key Reasoning: The court found that all statutory requirements were met—the bank is a registered secured creditor, proper notice was issued under Section 13(2), and symbolic possession was published in newspapers. The court imposed conditions requiring the bank to deposit ₹15,000 as commissioner remuneration and directed the commissioner to prepare a panchnama before handing over possession to the bank. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts